Canadian-based skincare brand The Ordinary is well, anything but ordinary. Its line of no-frills skincare products has earned a loyal following for their simple formulas of clinical-grade ingredients that are void of additives and fragrances. And at $15 or less, they’re cheaper than the sad desk salad you bought for lunch.
If you haven’t heard of the brand yet, that’s all about to change. The Ordinary is expanding into cosmetics with two new foundations that the Internet is currently freaking out over. The Serum and Coverage Foundations have just solidified The Ordinary’s beauty cult-status by racking up a wait list of over 25,000 people ahead of their end-of-April launch.
The Serum Foundation lives up to its name with a serum-like texture that’s lightweight but can be built up for medium coverage. The Coverage Foundation is a pigment-rich, non-oily cream that offers more coverage without getting cakey. Both options are enriched with a special pigment suspension technology that helps the foundations go on smooth with a highly saturated effect. To put it plainly: they’ll melt into skin like butter, but still give you the amount of coverage you’re after.
What’s also impressive is the foundations’ diverse 21 shade range. The Ordinary has made it simple to find the best one for your complexion by denoting each color with a Y, N, or P, according to skin undertones. And the foundations’ SPF is unique, too. It’s mineral-based so it’s free harsh chemicals that are typically found in common sunscreen formulas. Oh, and did we mention that ringing in at $7 each these foundations also super-affordable like the rest of The Ordinary’s products? We’re beginning to understand their draw.
VIDEO: These Makeup Removers Will Literally Melt the Makeup off Your Face
But, to find out if all of the hype is real and if it’s really worth adding your name to the wait list, four InStyle editors put the Serum Foundation to the test. Keep scrolling to see what the product really looks like IRL, along with our honest thoughts on it.
When the heat is sweltering and the mere thought of wearing another sundress or skirt looms over you, reach for your favorite pair of shorts and throw on a blouse, maybe even a kitten heel or ballet flat to top off your look. The key here is to keep the shorts just long enough to avoid any dress code issues and look like you are about to hit the night club. Think easy, casual, and classic. A denim shirt or shirt lace top are always a great idea when putting together your shorts look.
VIDEO: Coinage: 10 Quotes From Famous Women About Money
The 2000s were a special time for MTV’s reality television division. While we watched music videos in the morning and new episodes of Laguna Beach and The Hills at night, the true power hours came during the afternoon into the evening when the network’s programming shifted to airing a specific brand of reality television shows.
Shows like Date My Mom, Next, and Pimp My Ride filled the time slots between The Real World, Road Rules, and as much as we wanted to look away, we simply couldn’t. This was mindless television at its height.
VIDEO: The Most Expensive TV Shows of All Time
So, with the news that My Super Sweet 16 is being revamped (yay!), here, we’ve rounded up and ranked the 10 best MTV sort-of reality shows that we miss the most (except for two that are still alive and kicking today!). Keep reading for a trip down cringe-worthy lane paved with the best the mid- to late-2000s had to offer.
It’s been another busy week in the world of entertainment.
Harry Styles achieved a double success with his first solo single; action-packed movie Fate of the Furious smashed global box office records; a mascara advert featuring Cara Delevingne was banned; fans of crime drama Broadchurch were impressed but bereft as the third and final series concluded – and much more…
Here’s a round-up of some things you might have missed:
ITV’s The Nightly Show didn’t get off to the strongest start – but its fortunes improved over its eight-week run.
The new entertainment series, which ended on Friday after being broadcast every week night since February in the 10pm slot normally occupied by the news, saw a different celebrity take over presenting duties each week.
But things improved as the series progressed, with the show gradually building an online audience and some presenters proving particularly popular with viewers.
An ITV spokesman said: “ITV is doing better than any other terrestrial channel this year in terms of year on year performance, we’ve had a really strong start to the year.
“We’re in a strong position to try some new things and experiment, it is imperative we try new things, which have the potential to enhance our entertainment offering.”
David Walliams was on hosting duties for The Nightly Show’s first week – and helped the series start strongly with an average of 2.9 million live viewers tuning in for its opening episode.
But his performance received negative reviews from critics and the audience dropped to 1.2 million by Friday’s programme.
“I think David Walliams just isn’t a natural presenter, and it really came across,” says Frances Taylor, TV critic for the Radio Times.
“He’s a great actor and comedian but we’d never seen him at the helm of a programme, and if you’re going to have revolving hosts you’ve got to have someone strong to kick it off.
“If you don’t, viewers will lose interest, and once they’ve gone, it’s difficult to get them back.”
Walliams put the viewing figures and poor reviews down to people being annoyed about the News at Ten being moved back by half an hour in the schedules.
After his stint, John Bishop, Davina McCall, Dermot O’Leary, Gordon Ramsay, Bradley Walsh and Jason Manford all had a turn.
Some presenters were more popular with viewers and critics – particularly O’Leary, who was booked for a second week later in the run.
Ramsay proved a successful booking too, and he helped the show build a stronger online following, largely due to the star guests he drew to the show.
UK chat show hosts such as Graham Norton, Alan Carr and Jonathan Ross regularly attract high-profile guests but their shows only air once a week.
When you’ve got five nights of shows to fill, talent booking is a greater challenge, especially outside the US, says author, lecturer and television executive Lyndsay Duthie.
“In the US, you’ve got A-list guests night after night because there’s a bigger talent pool to draw from,” she says.
“James Corden has Madonna and Michelle Obama taking part in Carpool Karaoke, which makes it not only entertaining, you can’t believe the talent they’ve got on there.”
The Nightly Show struggled a little on this front – but it did manage to attract some big names as it went on, particularly the week Ramsay was in charge.
“The stuff Gordon Ramsay did with John Legend has got such global appeal because they’re such big stars in America,” says Frances Taylor.
In one segment, which was a hit, Legend was seen at a piano, singing some of the foul-mouthed chef’s most famous TV insults.
“If you’ve got names like that then people all round the world will recognise them, and that means that it probably will go viral, and that’s the whole point of shows like this,” Taylor adds.
“Bradley Walsh interviewing Louise Redknapp didn’t have quite the same worldwide appeal.”
One of the benefits of producing a show which is recorded on the same day it’s broadcast is the writers’ ability to put in jokes about the day’s news events.
Taylor says: “A show like this lives and dies by the writing, and The Nightly Show was billed as a topical programme, but there was hardly any topicality in it.”
“The Oscars gaffe, which happened the day before their first show, was such a gift as a topic, but David Walliams could only come up with a couple of poor envelope swapping gags.”
She compares it to the pastiche The Late Late Show did in the US, where Corden dressed up as Emma Stone and sang a parody song about the Oscars mix-up, which Taylor says was a stronger treatment.
“If The Nightly Show comes back it needs to play on the topicality. The fact this is filmed a couple of hours before transmission, they’re not maximising that opportunity.”
But Duthie says: “In the US you have teams and teams of people writing the opening monologues, which is a luxury that most British shows don’t have.”
ITV pushed the News at Ten back by half an hour to make room for The Nightly Show as part of the broadcaster’s initiative to try out what it calls “Five Nights of New” schedule.
But, says Duthie, where The Nightly Show was concerned, it may have suffered due to its chosen timeslot. The most successful chat shows in the US start much later in the evening.
“In the UK we’re much more conservative,” she says. “By 10:30pm, peak time is over. But if a show is on later, you’re catching people coming home from the pub late at night, and a lot of younger viewers.”
She adds that part of the problem facing any new nightly entertainment show is the difference in audience expectation between the UK and the US.
‘Knives are out’
“We’ve gotten so used to watching light-hearted entertainment shows on Friday and Saturdays that a lot of British viewers aren’t used to upbeat, happy content on a Monday evening,” Duthie says.
“Also, perhaps the networks wouldn’t pay for original programming at 11:30pm in the UK – budgets are usually spent by about 10:30.”
But, she praised ITV for being willing to try something new in the first place: “As much as I love the News at Ten, it wasn’t performing very well for ITV, so commercially it was a good decision to look at that 10 o’clock slot.”
ITV’s director of TV Kevin Lygo told Broadcast magazine: “In terms of The Nightly Show, this eight-week run is about extending the 10pm hour, extending the primetime feel of ITV, and seeing how that looks and feels during this period and how viewers respond to something other than repeats, alongside the News.
“The intention was to make that hour feel a bit fresh and different with some stunt scheduling and I think we’ve done that.
“After the run has finished we’ll obviously look at the shows and all the data and discuss what next.
“The broader point is – TV is a risk business, you need to try new things, and launch them with confidence and visibility to give them the best chance of success.
“And you’ve got keep doing that, and we will.”
Social media presence
US chat show hosts – from Ellen DeGeneres to Jimmy Fallon – now depend heavily on building a strong online following to match their viewing figures.
The Nightly Show had mixed fortunes on this front, with some segments not attracting many views, but others going viral worldwide.
At the time of writing, a compilation of Ramsay’s best pranks during his week on the show has attracted 3.4 million views.
Fay Ripley giving parenting tips to John Bishop, in contrast, has had just a couple of hundred views.
But while social media success can give a show a huge boost, it can also cause the problem of shows being judged too quickly.
“Now you get such a snap decision with everything,” says Taylor. “If something isn’t immediately funny, you see people all over Twitter saying ‘this is rubbish’.
“Social media can be great because you can build an audience for a show and make it an underground hit, like Fleabag.
“But conversely, when you’ve got something high profile that people don’t enjoy, the knives are out.
“To some extent, all publicity is good publicity, but if a show can’t breathe, it will put people off. Once that dies down, more people are likely to come to it naturally.”
But the ITV spokesman said the show’s online clip performance had been “impressive, amassing more than 40 million views in total for its online content across various platforms, and more than 50,000 subscribers and followers”.
“The figures reflected the viral nature of the content. The John Legend/Gordon Ramsay sketch accrued more than 16.5 million views on Facebook. It was shared over 310,000 times.
“The Gordon Ramsay Blender clip accrued over 4.3 million views on Facebook. It also trended at number one worldwide on YouTube for three days as well as accruing over 3.5 million views on YouTube.
“It was the most talked about video on the Internet for the weekend of 1-2 April.”
As for The Nightly Show’s future, ITV says it will make a decision after the series has ended, adding: “We don’t normally make decisions on recommissions until after a series has ended.”
Whether you consume music digitally or collect vinyl records, Brexit has the potential to affect you.
The UK music industry, like its counterparts in other countries, has had a tough time adapting to the technological shake-ups of recent years.
But now it also has to plan for the changes that will be ushered in by the UK’s decision to leave the European Union.
Obviously there is still huge uncertainty about what the country’s future relationship with the EU will be like, since its expected departure in the spring of 2019 is still subject to lengthy negotiations.
However, it is already possible to identify areas of the music business that may feel the effects.
With the industry’s annual Record Store Day falling this year on Saturday, 22 April, record shops are enjoying a boom in sales of old-fashioned vinyl releases.
The format was widely expected to die a slow death with the advent of the CD, but in recent times, vinyl records have managed to outsell downloads.
However, when Record Store Day 2020 rolls around, there is a risk that those singles and albums could cost significantly more.
If the UK does not manage to conclude a favourable trade deal with the EU, then tariffs may be applied on goods coming into the UK.
There are now only a couple of vinyl pressing plants left on British soil, so the majority of records sold in the UK are manufactured in factories based in other EU countries. The same goes for CDs.
If tariffs on goods return, record labels will face increased costs, which they will have to pass on to consumers.
So why buy music on physical formats anyway? This is the 21st Century, so go for streaming or downloads.
Well, even there, Brexit is likely to have consequences.
The pound has fallen in value in the wake of last June’s referendum outcome. The leading music streaming services, from Sweden’s Spotify to US-based Apple Music, are all multinational firms whose pricing policies are decided elsewhere.
In other ways, however, Brexit will have no effect at all. Many politicians and business leaders have called for the UK to preserve its access to the European single market, but in digital terms, things are more complicated.
And when it comes to the distribution of digital products, including music and e-books, consumers will still find that borders get in the way.
If you have an account with Amazon UK, you can buy a CD from Amazon’s French website, but it won’t allow you to buy the same music on download.
That said, streaming services are more unified. Spotify, for instance, makes practically all its catalogue accessible everywhere in the world, with some minor variations in local-language music.
But although Brussels has failed to create a digital single market for music consumers, it has done a lot for music producers.
People who make music can make money from it in various ways. As well as selling digital or physical copies of it, they are also paid royalties every time it is played in public.
There are two kinds of these:
mechanical royalties, which you get whenever your music is reproduced on CD or vinyl, or as a download or stream
performance royalties, which you get when your song is performed live or played on radio or television
And although there is no EU single market for digital music purchases, there is now a thriving single market for licensing music and collecting royalties on it.
In the UK, the main royalty collection society is PRS for Music. Its chief executive, Robert Ashcroft, says that the European Commission made a big difference with its Collective Rights Management Directive, which came into force in the UK in April last year.
As a result, it is now much easier to license music in many territories at once, rather than having to authorise it country by country, as was formerly the case.
PRS, for example, works in a joint venture with its counterparts in Sweden and Germany, STIM and GEMA, to operate a pan-European online music rights licensing service.
This means that songwriters and music publishing companies can get paid more quickly and accurately.
“We have already been licensing our rights on a pan-European basis,” says Mr Ashcroft. “Brexit won’t stop that and it’s not in our business interest to stop it either.”
The UK’s law on music copyright has changed in recent years because of Brussels.
In November 2013, UK copyright protection on sound recordings increased from 50 years to 70 years, in line with an EU directive approved in 2011.
However, recordings that had already slipped into the public domain, such as the Beatles’ first single, stayed there.
And there is a “use it or lose it” provision for hitherto unreleased recordings from 50 years ago. If record companies have ageing tracks in the vaults that they have never issued, then they have no comeback if other people get hold of them and release them.
Will all this change when the UK “takes back control”? PRS’s Mr Ashcroft thinks not.
“I expect it to continue unless and until someone presents an argument that it’s damaging to the economy,” he says.
Touring and nationality
One area where Brexit could have a negative impact is on touring musicians. There are fears that music groups might have to scale back European tours after Brexit and fewer European acts could travel to the UK.
“We have a very healthy business in royalties that are earned when our members’ works are performed overseas,” says PRS’s Mr Ashcroft. “If there were obstacles to British bands touring, that would be a potential challenge.”
At the same time, however, he is concerned about Brexit’s potential impact on his own organisation’s staffing levels. “Eleven per cent of our employees come from countries other than the UK. We operate daily in 13 languages. We need the prime minister to give assurances that the people resident and working here can stay.”
On that basis, he feels that the UK’s music business is well integrated with the rest of Europe and hopes it will stay that way, despite Brexit: “We are so international that we think our business transcends that.”
As a mom of three, Jennifer Garner has certainly read her fair share of bedtime stories. And to say that she’s picked up a few favorites along the way would be quite the understatement. “Gosh, kids’ books are my favorite literature,” the actress told InStyle during an interview for our May issue. “I basically like anything that’s written for thirteen and under!”
Thanks to her volunteer work with Save the Children’s early education programs, Garner frequently gets to flex her storytelling muscles. “I visit schools all over the country to read to students, and I love it so much,” she said. “I’ll read anything, really, but if I’m reading to young kids, I like to choose something with rhymes. They’re really the building blocks of language and really allow children to hold onto one word as they connect it to the next.”
VIDEO: Jennifer Garner’s Red Carpet Evolution
While it’s tricky for Garner to narrow down her top tales (“I could go on and on,” she said), there are a few fables that have stood the test of time. “You can never go wrong with anything by Julia Donaldson or Dr. Seuss, and I love reading Is Your Mama a Llama? to younger kids in school,” she said. “But the most fun I’ve had recently was reading Matilda to my daughter’s second-grade class.”
The most remarkable thing about Miranda Kerr’s enviable wardrobe is not that she has one—working with some of the biggest fashion brands on Earth does, after all, come with a a few perks—but the consistently thoughtful ways she finds to wear it. Like, we’re talking about a person here who is literally so above and beyond attractive that she’s paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to make clothing (the good, the bad, and yes, sometimes even the ugly) look better. If anyone has leeway to slack in the style department, it’s her.
VIDEO: Rosie Huntington-Whiteley’s Airport Style
So as the model rings in her 34th year alive today (~*~hApPy BiRtHdAy, MiRaNdA!!~*~), we can’t think of a better way to celebrate than an examination of her fashion prowess. Below, we’ve compiled five of her signature moves and, a crash course on stealing them for yourself. Keep scrolling to get schooled.
Eyebrows are arguably one of the most important features on our faces. One small change in the shape or even the height of the arch can drastically transform the way you look. That’s why many of us spend part of our mornings filling in the tails or drawing on hair-like strokes on the inner corners. We’ve even tested out more permanent techniques like eyebrow extensions and microblading. But investing in an eyebrow serum could help you put your eyebrow stencils, powders, and falsies to rest for good.
There are several formulas that are filled with nourishing and active ingredients that stimulate hair growth. We’ve gathered our favorites below, which include proteins that strengthen each strand of hair and essential oils that add moisture.
VIDEO: The Most Natural Way to Fake Full Eyebrow
You won’t see results overnight, but—with any good thing—it’s going to take time. And consistency is key. Find the perfect one for your budget ahead.
Unfortunately, not all of us were blessed with a booty like J.Lo, but that shouldn’t be enough of a reason to skip out on quality beach or pool time. Because we got your back, so to speak. There are ways to cheat your way to a bigger-looking bum, and it all starts with the right swimwear. Stay away from full-coverage bottoms and instead look for ones that reveal a little more cheek (think sexy hipsters and sporty briefs). Another route? Slip into bikini bottoms that pack on the frills, like bows, ruffles, and scalloped edges, to create the illusion of a substantial derriere. From ruffled sets to cheeky little bottoms, channel your inner Jennifer Lopez and embrace your booty with these five glorious butt-enhancing swimsuits, below.